Oct. 22, 2012 at 9:42am
Share/Bookmark View comments
Yet those who rail the loudest against any effort to staunch the flood of documented and preventable gun violence through even the most modest gun control proposals have not uttered a word against voter ID laws that disenfranchise eligible voters under the guise of preventing problems not proven to exist in any significant numbers. In fact, many of them — including the National Rifle Association and its political lackeys — are the most bellicose defenders of voter suppression measures. While they strenuously object to “prior restraint” on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, they have no problem with — and in many cases fervently endorse — prior restraint on the voting rights of their fellow law-abiding citizens. And, if any of them believes we should apply the post-crime “just prosecute the ones who violate the law and leave everyone else alone” approach to voter impersonation, they’ve been mighty quiet about it.
Blog comments powered by Disqus